| |||||
|
|
If it's not one thing, it's another. Just when food and beverage seem to be working together efficiently, you realize that turnover in housekeeping is higher than expected. You implement training and try to infuse order, only to discover the front desk is over- empowered and "giving the hotel away" as a result of not handling guest complaints appropriately. After more training, this time at the front desk, you find out that the kitchen and banquet are about to go to war with sales because they sold a product that the chef doesn't deliver and banquet isn't adequately staffed to provide. When asked, sales reminds you that they are following the sales training they got last month. Does this sound familiar? Do you feel that you go from department to department "fixing" things one after another in an effort to provide consistent quality for your guests? Is there a better way of operating? Definitely. In the course of working in the hotel business for more than 20 years, we have seen certain systems of operations surface continually. For example, organizations like the ones above operate on a system of individual solutions. This is the system of " fix one thing individually and then go to the next thing and fix it," thus creating the never-ending pattern of going from one individual problem to the next. Of course, there is nothing wrong with "fixing" problems. In fact, problems can be the sign of a healthy organization that is consciously aware of what needs to change to better serve it's customers. But where most hotels go wrong is that they are "fixing" the wrong thing. They're addressing the symptoms of the problems, not the causes. However, finding the "real" problems can be a challenge. Yet, if hotels put as much energy in this direction as they do trying to fix symptoms, their operating systems would lead to much higher levels of quality and performance. A common "symptom" is a lack of collaboration between departments. Most hotels focus their attention on the departments in looking for solutions, when they should be looking at their executive team. Chances are, the executive team only goes through the motions of being a team. Rather, they work as individuals. Looking further, they will find that their managers aren't working as a team either. Then, checking inter-departmentally, the probability of finding teamwork at this level is nil. The problem is with executives and their general manager and how they model the way to act as a team for the rest of the hotel. How does the general manager relate to his/her executive team? As individuals or as a team? Whatever happens here determines the system of collaboration for the hotel. This is the root cause of the problem. If the problem is not addressed at this level, then you will continue to go from place to place "fixing" the lack of collaboration. When root causes are addressed and corrected, things stay fixed because the system of operation is changed. Your organization begins to operate on a whole new level whose "symptoms" include consistent quality, higher profits, lower turnover, fewer fires to put out, and higher customer satisfaction. The method of addressing the root causes of problems rather than their symptoms is based upon the premise that problems are co-created by everyone involved. The solutions, then, lie in the interaction and behaviors among you. In looking for these problems and solutions you need to examine your current system of problem solving. On what level do you approach your solutions? As an individual, a team, or a department? Our experience shows that hotels with organizational, or "One Team" perspective, are hotels finding long-term solutions.
This is not, however, the most popular perspective. Perhaps the biggest reason organizations choose to look at symptoms rather than causes of problems is that it requires less responsibility, accountability, and ownership. If your organizations culture is one in which individual solutions are sought, it's acceptable to give the problem to someone else. If your culture seeks team or departmental solutions, any issues that are near the boundaries of responsibility are candidates for shifting to another department. With the "one Team Hotel," or organizational perspective, there are no gaps in responsibility. Everyone co-owns the objectives of the organization and seeks solutions that are in line with attaining them - which means true resolution of issues. A One Team Hotel is characterized by three primary standards. The first is equal value, which requires the acknowledgement that everyone in the hotel is equally valuable and necessary in providing quality guest service and satisfaction. Of course, there are different roles and responsibilities. But ask yourself how the guest might feel if, for example, there was no one to wash the dishes or to make the beds. The second attribute of a One Team Hotel is the concept of co-responsibility. Everyone is responsible for the objectives of the hotel. Co-responsibility requires that you do what you are currently doing, but do it differently. This may mean involving others, delegating, or other such notions that you may or may not be ready to try. Co-responsibility also means no more "It's not my job." You're all in this together. Equally important is that if your co-workers are not holding up their end of the bargain, you need to let them know it, and they need to be willing to do something about it. The third building block of the One Team Hotel is self-responsibility- the willingness to look at what part you are playing in what's going on and acting towards the common end of profit, quality, and guest satisfaction. Self-responsibility requires that the focus for action and solution be on you, not someone else. This is perhaps the most difficult aspect of acting as a One Team Hotel, and the one that will have the most impact in creating a system for success. We all know, whether we admit it or not, that it is easier to look at what someone else is doing or not doing than it is to look at ourselves. However, we cannot change other's behaviors, we can only impact them through our own actions. That is why focusing on what the other guy is doing doesn't result in action or solutions. We can only change our own behaviors. Self-responsibility supports us to act in ways to create positive results for the individual, the team, and the organization. The changes that occur as a result of acting from a One Team perspective are long-term because they are more than skin deep. There are hotels where "quality" and "customer service" are like a cardboard façade that tends to fall over and reveal the mess when things get hectic or an unusual situation needs handling. When employees act for the organization, they are acting from a foundation that can support day-to-day problems. This foundation is ingrained in all aspects of the hotel. In the One Team Hotel, staff sand management have been led through the process that has taken them from a working "group"- which had no focus on or commitment to collective performance, no understood common goal or purpose, and no system no accountability - to a "real team" with shared responsibility, a sense of solidarity and collaboration, high performance standards, commitment to mutual accountability, and success. A One Team organization creates a culture of success. People are motivated to come to work because they like working in a culture committed to quality and excellence. Furthermore, they know how to create and maintain it on all levels-both for themselves and the guests. The system of addressing the root causes rather than symptoms and concept of co-responsibility also applies to the successes of an organization-address to root causes of success and co-create the organization you always wanted to be a part of. Equal value, co-responsibility, and self-responsibility are keys to creating a One Team Hotel. If you want to build a system for success, now that you have these keys, start with yourself and begin immediately.
|
||||
![]() |
info@MetaCG.com, (845) 687-4324,
Site Map
Copyright MetaSystem Consulting Group |
||||